7 Artists Who Use Art for Activism
Art has always played a role in social change. It can document injustice, question authority, and create space for new ideas. The seven artists featured in this post use their work to engage with political, social, and cultural issues in direct and often risky ways.
From public murals to performances, installations, and research-driven projects, each artist approaches activism differently—but all share a commitment to using art as a tool for awareness, critique, and civic engagement.
Read also:
Hi there — before we continue:
I’d love to build a small community on Instagram and try out some short-form content over there. It would mean a lot if you could hop on IG and follow me @art_sprouts_art.
Also, what kind of content would you like to see from me next?
Drop a comment below or send me a DM on Instagram to let me know!
Table of Contents
7 Powerful Examples of Art as Activism
Ai Weiwei (China)
Few figures have challenged political power through art as visibly and persistently as Ai Weiwei. Born in Beijing in 1957, Ai grew up in exile in China’s remote northwest after his father, the renowned poet Ai Qing, was branded a rightist and silenced during Mao’s Anti-Rightist Campaign. This early exposure to political persecution laid the foundation for Ai’s lifelong skepticism toward state authority.
In the 1980s, Ai lived in New York, where he immersed himself in conceptual art and the work of artists like Duchamp and Warhol. Even in his early experiments—photographing himself flipping off major monuments or dropping a Han dynasty urn—Ai combined irreverence with critique, challenging both Western and Chinese notions of cultural value, permanence, and power.
Upon returning to China in 1993, he became an increasingly vocal critic of censorship and authoritarianism. One of the key vehicles for his early activism was his blog, launched in 2006, where he documented everything from his creative process to blunt political commentary.
The blog attracted millions of readers and became a space of counter-narrative and civil resistance, especially following the 2008 Sichuan earthquake. When the government suppressed the death toll of children killed in poorly constructed schools, Ai launched a citizen investigation and published the names of the victims online. The act led to surveillance, physical assault by police, and eventually the shutting down of his blog in 2009.
But Ai’s work only grew louder. Installations like “Remembering” (2009), featuring 9,000 children’s backpacks spelling out a quote from a grieving mother, and “Straight” (2008–12), consisting of 150 tons of rebar salvaged from quake rubble, stand as memorials and indictments. In 2010, he debuted “Sunflower Seeds” at Tate Modern, a massive installation of hand-painted porcelain seeds—a commentary on mass production, individuality, and the collectivism enforced by the state.
In 2011, after years of government pressure, Ai was abducted and detained without charge for 81 days. The international outcry was massive. He was eventually released but kept under surveillance and forbidden to leave the country. In 2015, the Chinese government returned his passport and he relocated to Europe, first settling in Berlin and later in the UK and Portugal.
Since his move, Ai has shifted his focus toward migration, displacement, and human rights. His documentary “Human Flow” (2017) spans 23 countries, examining the global refugee crisis through both statistical magnitude and intimate human stories. He has also worked on installations that foreground asylum seekers, such as “Law of the Journey” (2017), a 70-meter-long inflatable boat filled with faceless refugee figures, exhibited in Prague.
The Chinese art world does not exist. In a society that restricts individual freedoms and violates human rights, anything that calls itself creative or independent is a pretence. It is impossible for a totalitarian society to create anything with passion and imagination.
Ai Weiwei via The Guardian, 2012
Keith Haring (USA)
Born in Pennsylvania in 1958, Keith Haring came of age at a time of profound cultural and political shifts in the United States. He arrived in New York in the late 1970s, a city reeling from economic crisis but vibrating with underground energy—graffiti, punk, hip hop, and queer liberation movements were all reshaping the cultural landscape. Haring found his artistic voice in this hybrid space, choosing the subway system as his first canvas, where he drew hundreds of chalk drawings on empty black ad panels. His simple, instantly recognizable lines—radiant babies, barking dogs, dancing bodies—were deliberately accessible, inviting interpretation and interaction from commuters across class and race.
Haring’s decision to work in public wasn’t just aesthetic—it was political. He believed art belonged to everyone, not just those who could afford museum admission. As he later wrote in a manifesto:
“The public has a right to art. The public is being ignored by most contemporary artists. Art is for everybody.”
While his imagery was playful and kinetic, his themes were often deeply serious. He addressed drug addiction, apartheid, environmental collapse, capitalist greed, homophobia, and most urgently, the AIDS epidemic, which was ravaging the queer community and met with widespread silence and neglect from political institutions. After being diagnosed with HIV in 1988, Haring’s activism intensified. He created powerful works such as “Silence = Death” and “Ignorance = Fear”, adapting the iconography of street signs and advertising to broadcast urgent public health messages. His art became both a warning and a call to action, rooted in the belief that visibility was a form of resistance.
He was part of a post-Warhol generation that included Jean-Michel Basquiat and Kenny Scharf, artists who blurred the line between high and low culture, drawing on pop, street art, and club life. Haring’s Pop Shop, opened in 1986, aimed to democratize access to his art and bypass the exclusivity of galleries. Though he was criticized for commercializing his work, Haring defended it as a way to bring people up, not dumb things down. As artist Carlos Rodriguez recalled, “he was really making headway for a lot of people. He was making street art acceptable.”
In 1989, he founded the Keith Haring Foundation to support AIDS organizations and children’s programs. His final years were marked by relentless creativity: large-scale murals in hospitals and schools, collaborations with ACT UP and UNICEF, and projects that defied the commodification of his work. His Crack Is Wack mural (1986) in Harlem and the Tuttomondo mural in Pisa (1989) remain some of the clearest examples of how he merged activism, public space, and a universal visual language.
Haring died in 1990 at 31. In just over a decade, he created a body of work that reached far beyond the art world. His drawings were immediate, public, and often political. He used art to speak out, to connect with people, and to make issues visible, to cut through silence, fear, and social hypocrisy.
Read also:
Are You Enjoying this kind of content?
Sign up to receive thoughtful articles, teaching tools, and creative prompts straight to your inbox.
Shirin Neshat (Iran)
Shirin Neshat was born in Qazvin, Iran, in 1957. She left the country in 1975 to study art in the United States, just a few years before the 1979 Islamic Revolution dramatically reshaped Iranian society. When she returned to Iran in the early 1990s, after more than a decade abroad, she encountered a homeland profoundly altered—especially in terms of gender, censorship, and the role of religion in public life. The experience became a turning point, and her art took a new direction.
Since the Islamic Revolution, I have gravitated toward making art that is concerned with tyranny, dictatorship, oppression and political injustice. Although I don’t consider myself an activist, I believe my art—regardless of its nature—is an expression of protest, a cry for humanity.
Her work spans photography, video, and film, and often centers on the experiences of Muslim women caught between public and private identities, tradition and modernity, power and silence. In her iconic photo series Women of Allah(1993–97), she overlays black-and-white portraits of women—often herself—with Persian calligraphy and images of guns. The result is both beautiful and unsettling, confronting viewers with the complexities of gender, martyrdom, and violence under theocratic rule.
Neshat’s videos—like Turbulent (1998), Rapture (1999), and Soliloquy (1999)—use dual-screen projection to contrast the lived experiences of men and women in Islamic societies. In Turbulent, for example, a male singer performs to an applauding audience, while a woman sings in an empty room, her voice raw and experimental. The contrast is stark, and deeply political.
Though Neshat often insists she is an artist, not an activist, the political implications of her work are unavoidable. Her films—such as Women Without Men (2009), which won the Silver Lion at the Venice Film Festival—explore Iran’s history of political repression and resistance, especially from the perspective of women. She has spoken openly about the emotional toll of exile, the feeling of not fully belonging in either Iran or the West, and how that in-betweenness shapes her work.
Her outspokenness and visibility have come at a cost. She has not been able to return to Iran for many years, and her work is banned there. She lives and works in exile, often using metaphor and visual poetry as a way to address censorship and avoid didacticism.
Looking for more art ideas, book picks, and interactive content?
Follow me on Instagram @art_sprouts_art for extras, sneak peeks, and a chance to shape future posts.
Tag your work with #ArtSproutsArt—I’d love to share it!
Suzanne Lacy (USA)
Suzanne Lacy, born in 1945 in California, is a pioneer of socially engaged and performance-based art. Since the 1970s, she has blurred the boundaries between art, activism, and community work, using performance not as theatrical spectacle, but as a public intervention—a way to make urgent social issues visible in civic life.
Lacy’s work focuses on gender violence, aging, labor, race, and the politics of care, often involving dozens or even hundreds of participants. One of her most influential early pieces, Three Weeks in May (1977), addressed the epidemic of rape in Los Angeles by publicly mapping police-reported assaults on a city-wide map displayed in a downtown shopping center. But the project extended far beyond the map: it included press conferences, self-defense classes, media appearances, and a performance on the steps of Los Angeles City Hall. The work unfolded across multiple spaces, drawing in journalists, activists, artists, and the public in an ambitious, city-wide campaign.
What distinguishes Lacy’s practice is not just its collaborative nature, but her deep commitment to context. In her writings—especially in Leaving Art: Writings on Performance, Politics, and Publics, 1974–2007—Lacy emphasizes that her performances are not fixed forms to be repeated, but situated practices that respond to specific political climates and communities. They are temporal, unfolding in dialogue with their environment, and evolving—or ending—as circumstances shift.
Her performances often take months or years to develop, grounded in relationships and trust-building with the people involved. In The Oakland Projects (1991–2001), she worked with teenagers, police officers, and educators to address public perceptions of police brutality, social injustice, education, and other social issues. The resulting performances, policy conversations, and media collaborations spanned a decade, continually adapting to the shifting dynamics of the city.
Lacy doesn’t position herself above her subjects—she works with, not on, communities. This ethic has influenced generations of socially engaged artists, especially those working in education, urban spaces, or public health.
She has also paid the price of working in this liminal space between art and activism: her work has often been underrecognized by the commercial art world, difficult to archive, and resistant to commodification. But that’s precisely the point. For Lacy, performance is not a product—it’s a civic act, a gesture of visibility, and a strategy for making public what is often private or ignored.
Tania Bruguera (Cuba)
Tania Bruguera, born in Havana in 1968, is one of the most politically outspoken artists among those featured here. Raised in Cuba during the post-revolutionary decades and the daughter of a government diplomat, she grew up inside a system defined by surveillance, ideology, and official narratives. That background shaped her understanding of art not simply as expression, but as a way to intervene directly in political and civic life.
In 2002, she founded the Cátedra Arte de Conducta (Behavior Art School), an independent study program hosted within Cuba’s national art school. The project, which ran until 2009, focused on training young artists in performance, critical theory, and socially engaged practices. But it also functioned as a conceptual and political gesture. Bruguera used her access to institutional platforms—such as the Havana Bienal—to subvert their intended purpose. On several occasions, she exhibited her students’ works as her own contributions, thereby confronting conventional structures of authorship and influence within the international art circuit.
Her work gained wider public attention during the 2009 Havana Biennial, with the performance Tatlin’s Whisper #6. A podium and microphone were placed in the exhibition space. One by one, audience members were invited to speak freely for one minute while performers in military fatigues placed a white dove on each speaker’s shoulder—a visual echo of the moment in 1959 when a dove famously landed on Fidel Castro during a revolutionary speech. Some participants called for democracy and freedom of expression. Among them was Cuban dissident and blogger Yoani Sánchez. The government reacted with hostility, issuing a statement condemning the piece as a “shameful opportunism” that offended Cuban artists and foreign guests.
Bruguera has long maintained that her work is not designed to provoke for its own sake, but to open up political imagination and civic agency. In 2014, when she attempted to restage Tatlin’s Whisper in Havana’s Plaza de la Revolución, she was arrested multiple times and held in detention without formal charges. Her passport was confiscated. Exhibitions and travel were repeatedly blocked. In 2015, she launched #YoTambienExijo, a campaign for freedom of expression in Cuba, and in 2016 she established INSTAR (Instituto de Artivismo Hannah Arendt), an independent civic education space in Havana focused on political literacy, artistic experimentation, and democratic participation.
In 2018, she announced her intention to run for the Cuban presidency; the proposal was never intended to follow electoral procedure, but to challenge her fellow citizens to imagine a future beyond the limits imposed by single-party rule.
Theaster Gates (USA)
Theaster Gates was born in 1973 in Chicago, the youngest of nine children in a working-class family. His father was a roofer, and Gates himself trained in ceramics before studying urban planning and religious studies. This mix of craft, civic infrastructure, and spiritual inquiry runs throughout his work, which often addresses the material, social, and cultural histories of Black life in America—particularly in the urban Midwest.
Gates lives and works in Chicago, and much of his artistic practice is inseparable from the city itself. His work confronts questions of disinvestment, race, gentrification, and historical erasure, especially in neighborhoods like Greater Grand Crossing, a predominantly Black area on the South Side of Chicago where he has lived and worked for years.
Often described as a “social practice installation artist,” Gates makes work that merges sculpture, architecture, performance, archival preservation, and urban renewal. The term refers to a form of art that is grounded in social engagement and community interaction, often operating outside traditional gallery settings. In Gates’ case, it means that his “installations” are not just exhibitions, but real buildings, libraries, gathering spaces, and community infrastructures.
In 2009, he founded the Rebuild Foundation, a non-profit that renovates abandoned buildings and transforms them into community cultural spaces. One of the most well-known is the Stony Island Arts Bank, a former bank building turned into an archive, library, and gallery for African American history and culture. It houses collections that include magazines from Ebony and Jet, glass slides from the University of Chicago, and the vinyl archive of DJ Frankie Knuckles.
Through these projects, Gates reclaims neglected space and reactivates it with history, memory, and artistic engagement. He often uses salvaged materials—floorboards, bricks, roof tiles—not only for their texture but for the histories they carry. His installations might look like sculpture or architecture, but they are also platforms for performances, readings, and public conversations.
Gates doesn’t separate his studio work from his social initiatives. Instead, he treats them as interdependent: the sale of his artworks often funds the Foundation’s programs. He has said that he wants to create “a cultural infrastructure for Black intelligence,” and that much of his work is about making visible the value of things and people that society has abandoned.
Guerrilla Girls (Worldwide)
The Guerrilla Girls are a collective of anonymous feminist artists founded in New York City in 1985. They emerged in direct response to the exclusion of women artists from major exhibitions, particularly the International Survey of Recent Painting and Sculpture at the Museum of Modern Art, where only 13 of the 169 artists shown were women. The group formed to expose and protest the systemic sexism and racism of the art world, using posters, billboards, leaflets, and public interventions to bring visibility to the numbers and patterns institutions preferred to ignore.
Read also:
Each member adopts the name of a dead woman artist—like Frida Kahlo or Liubov Popova—and appears in public wearing a gorilla mask. The decision to remain anonymous was strategic: it protected their personal careers and emphasized collective action over individual fame. But the masks also became a visual tool, turning protest into performance.
From the beginning, the Guerrilla Girls developed a language and tone that broke with earlier feminist movements. They focused on wit, parody, and accessible graphics rather than heavy theoretical frameworks or confrontational aesthetics. They addressed structural issues such as sexual violence, exclusion, and tokenism through the lens of irony and visual clarity, believing that humor could open conversations where anger might shut them down.
Their posters became instantly recognizable. Works like “Do women have to be naked to get into the Met. Museum?”exposed the disparity between how women were represented as subjects versus how few were represented as artists. Over the years, they have expanded their focus to include Hollywood, politics, and broader questions of cultural power, but the art world has remained their central target—its gatekeeping, blind spots, and persistent underrepresentation of women and artists of color.
They also operate with research-driven precision. The Guerrilla Girls Investigation Group (GIGG) has compiled detailed reports on museum boards, acquisitions, and funding patterns, pushing institutions to respond to their own data. By combining public visibility with internal scrutiny, they have become one of the most persistent and effective forces in institutional critique.
Nearly four decades later, the Guerrilla Girls are still active. Their work appears in major collections, but they continue to operate independently and anonymously.
If you’re exploring how to talk about activism, politics, or justice through art—whether in a classroom, a museum, or at home—these profiles can be a starting point.
You can find more resources, lesson ideas, and book lists throughout the blog. And if you want to stay updated, sign up for the newsletter below or follow along on Instagram at @art_sprouts_art.
